Chapter 4. Quadratic Residues¶
Quadratic Residues¶
-
Def 4.1 Quadratic Residue: Let \(p\) be an odd prime, then \(a\in\mathbb{Z}\) with \(\gcd(a,p)=1\) is called a quadratic residue (QR) modulo \(p\) if the congruence
\[ x^2 \equiv a \pmod p \]has a solution. Otherwise \(a\) is called a quadratic non-residue (QNR) modulo \(p\).
-
Thm 4.2 Property of QR:
-
Let \(g\) be a primitive root modulo \(p\), then \(a\) is a QR modulo \(p \iff a=g^{2k} \pmod p\) for some integer \(k\).
Proof of 1
- \(\implies\): Assume \(a=QR\), then \(\exists b\in\mathbb{Z}\) s.t. \(b^2 \equiv a \pmod p\). Let \(b \equiv g^k \pmod p\) for some integer \(k\), then \(a \equiv b^2 \equiv g^{2k} \pmod p\).
- \(\impliedby\): Assume \(a \equiv g^{2k} \pmod p\) for some integer \(k\), then \(g^k\) is a solution to \(x^2 \equiv a \pmod p\), so \(a\) is a QR.
-
\(a = QR, b = QR \implies ab = QR\).
- \(a = QNR, b = QNR \implies ab = QR\).
- \(a = QR, b = QNR \implies ab = QNR\).
-
The number of \(QR\) / \(QNR\) modulo \(p\) is \(\frac{p-1}{2}\).
Proof of 5
- Since there are \(p-1\) non-zero elements in \(\mathbb{Z}_p^*\), consider \(x\in\mathbb{Z}_p^*\), then \((p-x)^2 \equiv p^2 - 2px + x^2 \equiv x^2 \pmod p\).
- Consider \(x^2\) for \(x\in\{1, 2, \cdots, \frac{p-1}{2}\}\), claim that \(\forall 1\leq x < y \leq \frac{p-1}{2}, x^2 \not\equiv y^2 \pmod p\).
- If \(x^2 \equiv y^2 \pmod p\), then \(y^2 - x^2 \equiv (y-x)(y+x) \equiv 0 \pmod p\), thus \(p \mid y-x\) or \(p \mid y+x\).
- Since \(1\leq x < y \leq \frac{p-1}{2}\), \(y+x < \frac{p-1}{2} + \frac{p-1}{2} = p-1 < p\) and \(y-x < p\), thus \(p \nmid x+y\) and \(p \nmid x-y\), contradiction.
- Thus \(x^2\) for \(x\in\{1, 2, \cdots, \frac{p-1}{2}\}\) are \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) distinct \(QR\) modulo \(p\), and the remaining \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) non-zero elements are \(QNR\) modulo \(p\).
-
Legendre Symbol¶
-
Def 4.3 Legendre Symbol: Let \(p\) be an odd prime, then for any \(a\in\mathbb{Z}\), the Legendre symbol \(\left(\frac{a}{p}\right)\) is defined as
\[ \left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = \begin{cases} 0 ,& p \mid a \\ 1 ,& a \text{ is a QR modulo } p \\ -1 ,& a \text{ is a QNR modulo } p \end{cases} \] -
Thm 4.4: The number of solutions to \(x^2 \equiv a \pmod p\) is \(1 + \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)\).
Proof
- Case 1: \(p \mid a\), then \(x^2 \equiv a \equiv 0 \pmod p\) has exactly one solution \(x \equiv 0 \pmod p\). Thus \(1 = 1 + \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)\), done.
- Case 2: \(a\) is a QR modulo \(p\), then \(a \equiv g^{2k} \pmod p\) for some \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\). Then \(x^2 \equiv g^{2k} \pmod p\), so \(x \equiv \pm g^k \pmod p\) are two distinct solutions to \(x^2 \equiv a \pmod p\). Thus \(2 = 1 + \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)\), done.
- Case 3: \(a\) is a QNR modulo \(p\), then there are no solutions to \(x^2 \equiv a \pmod p\). Thus \(0 = 1 + \left(\frac{a}{p}\right)\), done.
-
Thm 4.5 Euler's Criterion: Let \(p\) be an odd prime, then
\[ \left(\frac{a}{p}\right) \equiv a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \pmod p \]Proof
- Case 1: \(p \mid a\), then \(a=kp\) for some \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\). Then \(\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) \equiv 0 \equiv (kp)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \pmod p\), done.
- Case 2: \(a\) is a QR modulo \(p\), then \(a \equiv g^{2k} \pmod p\) for some \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\). Then \(\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) \equiv 1 \equiv (g^{2k})^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv g^{(p-1)k} \pmod p\), done.
-
Case 3: \(a\) is a QNR modulo \(p\), then \((a^{\frac{p-1}{2}})^2 \equiv a^{p-1} \equiv 1 \pmod p\), i.e. \(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}}\) is a solution to \(x^2 \equiv 1 \pmod p\), thus \(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv \pm 1 \pmod p\). Let \(a\equiv g^k \pmod p\) with odd \(k\), then
\[ \mathrm{ord}_p(a) = \mathrm{ord}_p(g^k) = \frac{\mathrm{ord}_p(g)}{\gcd(\mathrm{ord}_p(g), k)} = \frac{p-1}{\gcd(p-1, k)} \]Suppose \(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv 1 \pmod p\), then \(\frac{p-1}{\gcd(p-1, k)} \mid \frac{p-1}{2}\), i.e. \(\exists t\in\mathbb{Z}\) s.t. \(\frac{p-1}{\gcd(p-1, k)} \cdot t = \frac{p-1}{2}\), thus \(\gcd(p-1, k) = 2t\), which contradicts the fact that \(k\) is odd. Thus \(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv -1 \pmod p\), done.
-
Thm 4.6 Properties of Legendre Symbol: Let \(p\) be an odd prime, then for any \(a, m, n\in\mathbb{Z}\), we have
- \(\left(\frac{mn}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{m}{p}\right)\left(\frac{n}{p}\right)\)
- \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} = \begin{cases} 1 ,& p \equiv 1 \pmod 4 \\ -1 ,& p \equiv 3 \pmod 4 \end{cases}\)
- \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p^2-1}{8}} = \begin{cases} 1 ,& p \equiv 1, 7 \pmod 8 \\ -1 ,& p \equiv 3, 5 \pmod 8 \end{cases}\)
- \(\sum_{a\in\mathbb{Z}_p} \left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = 0\).
Proof
- By Euler's Criterion, \(\left(\frac{mn}{p}\right) \equiv (mn)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv m^{\frac{p-1}{2}} n^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv \left(\frac{m}{p}\right)\left(\frac{n}{p}\right) \pmod p\). Since \(\left(\frac{mn}{p}\right), \left(\frac{m}{p}\right), \left(\frac{n}{p}\right) \in \{-1, 0, 1\}\), we have \(\left(\frac{mn}{p}\right) = \left(\frac{m}{p}\right)\left(\frac{n}{p}\right)\), done.
- By Euler's Criterion, \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) \equiv (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \pmod p\). Since \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right), (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \in \{-1, 1\}\), we have \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}}\). If \(p \equiv 1 \pmod 4\), then \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) is even, thus \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = 1\). If \(p \equiv 3 \pmod 4\), then \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) is odd, thus \(\left(\frac{-1}{p}\right) = -1\), done.
-
-
Case 1: \(p \equiv 1 \pmod 4\):
\[ \begin{aligned} S &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdot 6\cdots (p-1) \\ &= 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-1}{2} \cdot \frac{p+3}{2} \cdot \frac{p+7}{2} \cdots (p-1) \\ &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-1}{2} \cdot (\frac{p+3}{2}-p) \cdot (\frac{p+7}{2}-p) \cdots (p-1-p) \pmod p \\ &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-1}{2} \cdot (-\frac{p-3}{2}) \cdot (-\frac{p-7}{2}) \cdots (-1) \pmod p \\ &\equiv (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{4}} \cdot (\frac{p-1}{2})! \pmod p \\ \end{aligned} \]Thus \(2^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{4}} \pmod p\), i.e. \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{4}}\). If \(p \equiv 1 \pmod 8\), then \(\frac{p-1}{4}\) is even, thus \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = 1\). If \(p \equiv 5 \pmod 8\), then \(\frac{p-1}{4}\) is odd, thus \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = -1\), done.
Consider \(S = 2\cdot 4\cdot 6\cdots (p-1) = 2^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \cdot 1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdots \frac{p-1}{2} \equiv 2^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \cdot \left(\frac{p-1}{2}\right)! \pmod p\).
-
Case 2: \(p \equiv 3 \pmod 4\):
\[ \begin{aligned} S &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdot 6\cdots (p-1) \\ &= 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-3}{2} \cdot \frac{p+1}{2} \cdot \frac{p+5}{2} \cdots (p-1) \\ &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-3}{2} \cdot (\frac{p+1}{2}-p) \cdot (\frac{p+5}{2}-p) \cdots (p-1-p) \pmod p \\ &\equiv 2\cdot 4\cdots \frac{p-3}{2} \cdot (-\frac{p-1}{2}) \cdot (-\frac{p-5}{2}) \cdots (-1) \pmod p \\ &\equiv (-1)^{\frac{p+1}{4}} \cdot (\frac{p-1}{2})! \pmod p \\ \end{aligned} \]Thus \(2^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \equiv (-1)^{\frac{p+1}{4}} \pmod p\), i.e. \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p+1}{4}}\). If \(p \equiv 3 \pmod 8\), then \(\frac{p+1}{4}\) is odd, thus \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = -1\). If \(p \equiv 7 \pmod 8\), then \(\frac{p+1}{4}\) is even, thus \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = 1\), done.
-
Thus, combine the two cases, we have \(\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{p^2-1}{8}}\), done.
-
-
Since \(\left(\frac{0}{p}\right) = 0\), \(\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = 1\) for \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) \(QR\) and \(\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = -1\) for \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) \(QNR\), we have \(\sum_{a\in\mathbb{Z}_p} \left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = 0 + \frac{p-1}{2} \cdot 1 + \frac{p-1}{2} \cdot (-1) = 0\), done.
Jacobi Symbol¶
-
Def 4.7 Jacobi Symbol: Let \(m\geq 3\) be an odd integer, assume that \(m\) has the standard factorization \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) with \(p_i\) are distinct odd primes and \(e_i \geq 1\), then for any \(a\in\mathbb{Z}\), the Jacobi symbol \(\left(\frac{a}{m}\right)\) is defined as
\[ \left(\frac{a}{m}\right) = \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \] -
Thm 4.8 Properties of Jacobi Symbol: Let \(m,n\geq 3\) be odd integers, then for any \(a, b\in\mathbb{Z}\), we have
- \(\left(\frac{a}{m}\right) = 0 \iff \gcd(a, m) > 1\).
- \(\left(\frac{ab}{m}\right) = \left(\frac{a}{m}\right)\left(\frac{b}{m}\right)\).
- \(\left(\frac{a}{mn}\right) = \left(\frac{a}{m}\right)\left(\frac{a}{n}\right)\).
- \(\left(\frac{n^2}{m}\right) = \left(\frac{n}{m^2}\right) = 1 \iff \gcd(n, m) = 1\).
- \(\left(\frac{-1}{m}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{m-1}{2}}\).
- \(\left(\frac{2}{m}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{m^2-1}{8}}\).
Proof
- Let \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) be the standard factorization of \(m\), then
- \(\implies\): Assume \(\left(\frac{a}{m}\right) = 0\), then \(\exists i\in\{1, 2, \cdots, r\}\) s.t. \(\left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right) = 0\), thus \(p_i \mid a\), so \(p_i \mid \gcd(a, m)\), thus \(\gcd(a, m) > 1\), done.
- \(\impliedby\): Assume \(\gcd(a, m) > 1\), then \(\exists i\in\{1, 2, \cdots, r\}\) s.t. \(p_i \mid a\), thus \(\left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right) = 0\), so \(\left(\frac{a}{m}\right) = 0\), done.
-
We have
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{ab}{m}\right) &= \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{ab}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \\ &= \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \cdot \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{b}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \\ &= \left(\frac{a}{m}\right)\left(\frac{b}{m}\right) \end{aligned} \] -
Let \(m=\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) and \(n=\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{f_i}\) with \(e_i, f_i \geq 0\), then
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{a}{mn}\right) &= \left(\frac{a}{\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i+f_i}}\right) = \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{e_i+f_i} \\ &= \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \cdot \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{f_i} \\ &= \left(\frac{a}{m}\right)\left(\frac{a}{n}\right) \end{aligned} \] -
Follows from (1), (2) and (3).
-
-
Method 1: Let \(m = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}\) be the standard factorization of \(m\), then
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{-1}{m}\right) &= \prod_{i=1}^r \left(\frac{-1}{p_i}\right)^{e_i} \\ &= \prod_{i=1}^r (-1)^{\frac{p_i-1}{2} e_i} \\ &= (-1)^{\sum_{i=1}^r \frac{p_i-1}{2} e_i} \overset{?}{=} (-1)^{\frac{m-1}{2}} \end{aligned} \]Claim that \(\sum_{i=1}^r \frac{p_i-1}{2} e_i \equiv \frac{m-1}{2} \pmod 2\).
Proof of 5:
- Method 2: We can prove by induction on \(m\):
- If \(m=3\), done.
-
Assume the claim holds for all odd integers \(\leq m\), then consider \(m+2 = pk\) for some odd prime \(p\) and odd integer \(k\geq 1\). Then
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{-1}{m+2}\right) &= \left(\frac{-1}{pk}\right) = \left(\frac{-1}{p}\right)\left(\frac{-1}{k}\right) \\ &= (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} \cdot (-1)^{\frac{k-1}{2}} \\ &= (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2} + \frac{k-1}{2}} \end{aligned} \]It is sufficient to prove \(\frac{p-1}{2} + \frac{k-1}{2} \equiv \frac{pk-1}{2} \pmod 2\). Let \(p = 2u + 1\) and \(k = 2v + 1\), then
\[ \begin{aligned} &\frac{p-1}{2} + \frac{k-1}{2} - \frac{pk-1}{2} \\ =& \frac{p+k-pk-1}{2} \\ =& \frac{-(p-1)(k-1)}{2} \\ =& -2uv \equiv 0 \pmod 2 \end{aligned} \]Thus \(\frac{p-1}{2} + \frac{k-1}{2} \equiv \frac{pk-1}{2} \pmod 2\), done.
-
-
Similar to (5), we can prove by induction on \(m\):
- If \(m=3\), done.
-
Assume the claim holds for all odd integers \(\leq m\), then consider \(m+2 = pk\) for some odd prime \(p\) and odd integer \(k\geq 1\). Then
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{2}{m+2}\right) &= \left(\frac{2}{pk}\right) = \left(\frac{2}{p}\right)\left(\frac{2}{k}\right) \\ &= (-1)^{\frac{p^2-1}{8}} \cdot (-1)^{\frac{k^2-1}{8}} \\ &= (-1)^{\frac{p^2-1}{8} + \frac{k^2-1}{8}} \end{aligned} \]It is sufficient to prove \(\frac{p^2-1}{8} + \frac{k^2-1}{8} \equiv \frac{(pk)^2-1}{8} \pmod 2\). Let \(p = 2u + 1\) and \(k = 2v + 1\), then
\[ \begin{aligned} &\frac{p^2-1}{8} + \frac{k^2-1}{8} - \frac{(pk)^2-1}{8} \\ =& \frac{p^2+k^2-(pk)^2-1}{8} \\ =& \frac{-(p^2-1)(k^2-1)}{8} \\ =& \frac{-(4u(u+1))(4v(v+1))}{8} \\ =& -2u(u+1)v(v+1) \equiv 0 \pmod 2 \end{aligned} \]Thus \(\frac{p^2-1}{8} + \frac{k^2-1}{8} \equiv \frac{(pk)^2-1}{8} \pmod 2\), done.
Quadratic Reciprocity¶
-
Thm 4.6 Law of Quadratic Reciprocity: Let \(m,n\) be odd integers with \(\gcd(m, n) = 1\), then
\[ \left(\frac{m}{n}\right)\left(\frac{n}{m}\right) = (-1)^{\frac{m-1}{2} \cdot \frac{n-1}{2}} \]Equivalently, \(\left(\frac{m}{n}\right) = \left(\frac{n}{m}\right) \cdot (-1)^{\frac{m-1}{2} \cdot \frac{n-1}{2}}\)
Example
-
Since
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{3}{17}\right) &= \left(\frac{17}{3}\right) \cdot (-1)^{\frac{3-1}{2} \cdot \frac{17-1}{2}} \\ &= \left(\frac{2}{3}\right) \cdot 1 \\ &= -1 \end{aligned} \]Thus \(3\) is a NQR modulo \(17\).
-
Since
\[ \begin{aligned} \left(\frac{6}{17}\right) &= \left(\frac{2}{17}\right) \cdot \left(\frac{3}{17}\right) \\ &= (-1)^{\frac{17^2-1}{8}} \cdot (-1) \\ &= -1 \end{aligned} \]Thus \(6\) is a NQR modulo \(17\).
-